Zaha in the Times yesterday

[glaziers fan]

They missed out the 0 after the 5.

Utter nonsense (hopefully)

[FFS]

Originally Posted by The Gerry Queen

Lazy journalism. Some sports journalists have got so used to thinking of us as 'cash strapped', they can't adapt to the changes we have made. There will be more of this in the summer. Steve Browett has proved this report wrong so time to move on.

But the club is 'cash strapped' and running at a loss. It's the owners personal wealth that keeps us going, not the revenue from matches, and there's a limit to that too.

Just because we have four very wealth owners doesn't mean the club is wealthy, and I doubt if there are more than a hanful of clubs (if any) who can boast otherwise.

[Dan A]

Originally Posted by FFS

But the club is 'cash strapped' and running at a loss. It's the owners personal wealth that keeps us going, not the revenue from matches, and there's a limit to that too.

Just because we have four very wealth owners doesn't mean the club is wealthy, and I doubt if there are more than a hanful of clubs (if any) who can boast otherwise.

So why aren't most other clubs that are running at a loss getting called cash strapped then?

We aren't cash strapped. If we was in debt then we would be i suppose, but we're not because our owners are putting money into the club.

[Ard]

Originally Posted by FFS

But the club is 'cash strapped' and running at a loss. It's the owners personal wealth that keeps us going, not the revenue from matches, and there's a limit to that too.

Just because we have four very wealth owners doesn't mean the club is wealthy, and I doubt if there are more than a hanful of clubs (if any) who can boast otherwise.

Going on your view, 99 per cent of clubs are cash strapped. Very few turn over a profit