CPFC BBS

CPFC BBS (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/index.php)
-   World of Sport (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   The NFL thread (https://www.cpfc.org/forums/showthread.php?t=137231)

pauldrulez 30-12-2009 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jazman
But sport is all about opinion. And you argue the toss over everything on here. So I thought I would. I agree Brees is the best QB in the NFC but I don't think Favre and Rodgers are any better than Romo has been this season.

And Manning, Rivers and Brady are not comparible as they are AFC so not strictly ahead of him.

Rodgers for me is the best QB in the NFC. He had NO Offensive Line for about 10 games. Then it's Brees as he has got so many weapons and has had quite a few shockers this year which puts him behind Rodgers.

Favre vs Romo is tight, but the way Favre played during the Voting weeks would have got him in ahead of Romo as the Cowboys had a few struggles. It's a toss-up between the 2, and Favre gets it due to being in the 3rd best team during the voting weeks and he had a lot of fan votes as well.

If you want the best rating system for QB: http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/qb

Brings every stat into play. Strength of Defense you play against, Effective Yards.

They make it as:
Brady, Manning, Rivers, Schaub, Roethlisberger.
Brees, Favre, Romo, E.Manning, Rodgers.

It's a better system even though it completely proves me wrong about A-Rod.

Vince Hilaire's Afro 30-12-2009 04:02 PM

It's just a shame that Jake Delhomme's finger injury came at the wrong time for the pro bowl.

jazman 30-12-2009 04:15 PM

I have been reading up some more about Rogers since my post and I quite agree with you Vince. I recall watching a couple of Packers games earlier in the season where he was completely pole axed several times through lack of protection. And when you consider that he has something special when he can drag the team to the play offs.

pauldrulez 30-12-2009 04:48 PM

:confused: Vince?

jazman 30-12-2009 04:52 PM

Oh, and Paul ....

pauldrulez 30-12-2009 05:02 PM

Thankyou Rupert.

And Jason. ;)

I'm a bit shocked that Austin isn't starting for the NFC as well, but I guess as he wasn't a full season star, he didn't get the tough vote.

He'll start next year.

Bit shocked by Witten being in there ahead of Celek or Gonzalez. But, his blocking has been awesome this year, and as a Tightend you need to keep your QB off his arse.

Something that Dallas Clark has never done. Stay in and block. He should be considered a WR not a TE.

jazman 30-12-2009 05:28 PM

Good point about TEs. Fine line between a TE and a WR. I always thought that a TE is a WR that is too fat, big, imobile, slow, muscular or which other way you want to put it ... Witten has taken the blocking part of his game to the next level this season whereas last year he was the Romo's favourite target and in that view more of a WR. Like you say, Dallas Clark is more of a WR

Strathclyde Eagle 30-12-2009 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jazman
http://jaytheeagle.blogspot.com/

Feel free to have a read. I must admit I've been blogging more about NFL than anything else which has suprised me ...

Tinyurl.com is your friend - http://tinyurl.com/yzt5zhz (handy link for tweeting).

jazman 30-12-2009 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strathclyde Eagle
Tinyurl.com is your friend - http://tinyurl.com/yzt5zhz (handy link for tweeting).

I'm learning every day ... :p

pauldrulez 30-12-2009 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jazman
Good point about TEs. Fine line between a TE and a WR. I always thought that a TE is a WR that is too fat, big, imobile, slow, muscular or which other way you want to put it ... Witten has taken the blocking part of his game to the next level this season whereas last year he was the Romo's favourite target and in that view more of a WR. Like you say, Dallas Clark is more of a WR

Whereas this year, Gates, Witten and to a bigger extent, Todd Heap have all blocked a lot this year.

Vernon Davis is another WR-type TE. But he does stay in and block occasionally.

jazman 30-12-2009 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strathclyde Eagle
Tinyurl.com is your friend - http://tinyurl.com/yzt5zhz (handy link for tweeting).

By the way, how did you do that for future reference?

pauldrulez 30-12-2009 09:36 PM

http://tinyurl.com

Paste your address in there and it does it for you.

Or you can make your own link on there.

Like I did with the Moss youtube vid.

http://tinyurl.com/mosswig

pauldrulez 30-12-2009 09:39 PM

http://photos-c.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos..._8331414_n.jpg

My mate in the UKPatriots got this today.

Wish I had the balls to get a Pats one.

jazman 30-12-2009 09:40 PM

Thanks Paul.

To be honest with you I don't like it. Far too big for my liking and looks a little odd if I may say ...

pauldrulez 30-12-2009 09:44 PM

It does look strange.

It's not really straight in the centre.

I might get one on my arm. But one that looks a bit better. I don't really like the Flying Elvis but don't fancy Pat Patriot showing his arse on my arm...

jazman 30-12-2009 09:49 PM

I would prefer a smaller one ... but must admit none of the NFL logo's look decent enough for a tatoo ...

peagle 30-12-2009 09:56 PM

I'd do the word patriots with the smaller version of that logo in it if I was going to do one. But I wouldnt. He's gonna look awfully silly when we next win the superbowl and he doesnt have it on there!

pauldrulez 30-12-2009 10:11 PM

He's going to update it in February with XLIV :p

;)

I'd consider a small Flying Elvis, but I could probably design something nice for myself.

jazman 30-12-2009 10:17 PM

Would have been even funnier if he already had XLIV done! :o

pauldrulez 30-12-2009 10:18 PM

:D

He could always tippex the I out and make it 45 :D


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.