Congratulations.

Robert Kraft abstained from voting, not Belichick.

It's not my unbiased view, Belicheat must be 'lacking in intelligence' as even he admitted it!

I wonder why? Maybe should ask John Gruden?

Maybe, just maybe, you should ask the officials... it was the booth official and the on-field official that changed the call.

Maybe we should ask Bill Belichick? Oh wait a minute, we don`t have to?
“It played a big role in that season,” Bill Belichick at the AFC Coaches breakfast on Tuesday.

I forgot Belichick threw the challenge flag for that play... Or not.

Brady was sacked by Charles Woodson. He fumbled & the Raiders recovered but it was overturned. I don`t know if he threw the challenge flag? Maybe I`m just a bitter Rams fan? ;)

This is the one that the NFL is down on. They are pushing more for the City of Industry plan, they don't like the numbers on the Staples Center location.

Was the rule in place back then that in the last two minutes all reviews come from the booth? I honestly can't remember.

Yeah, replay booth.

I was being sarcastic!

How Belichick has anything to do with the Tuck rule, I will never know!

If any team is to go to LA I hope it is the Rams!!! :p

Ed Reed has always seemed to be totally classy to me. More evidence here:

http://instagram.com/p/XPs1JSJ0-u/

why does the NFL insist on changing rules year after year....

Err, safety of the players in the instance of the crown rule, common sense in the case of the tuck rule.

Should change name to no contact league in the coming years

The crown of helmet rule for runners will be impossible to referee though and makes little sense and so is NOT the solution. When you are running with the ball you want to get as low as possible, dipping your shoulders etc. In a crowd, sometimes you cant try and go round someone and have to go over them so you duck down and power into contact. Where does a lowering of the head become presenting the crown in a small space and at great speed? Like it or not, your head is in the way when you lower your body like that and there's not a lot players can do about it.

Coming at it from a positive point of view, I can see a strong argument for the Tuck rule - we watch a passing league and we want to encourage the ball to be thrown. If someone is in the process of throwing and has therefore made himself more vulnerable to having the ball knocked away, why shouldnt he be protected against a turnover until he has the chance to regain strong control of the ball?

Paul, I need you here:

http://www.cpfc.org/forums/showthrea...1#post10934603

Done :p

I had mentioned it before that it wasn't.

Oh. Fins suck and overspent on Wally

You can lower your head if you're going through a pile. They don't want pointless 1 on 1 head contact in the open field.